There are only a few days to go in the court. I have been on one case since last Wednesday morning and the worker there thinks that it is very unlikely for us to get put onto another one at the end of the week. I'm not supposed to talk about the case to anyone, in case they influence my decision on what conclusions I reach, which is a big crock as they wouldn't know the details. Anyway, if you are at all interested you can read about the case here
(Ssshhh, obviously)
I feel that they're both guilty, but it is obvious that there are at least some who would disagree with this in my fellow 11 jurors. I'm not sure if I care enough to argue with these strangers with whom i share nothing but random twist of fate.
Highligths have included the Judge, who has been both superior and entertaining in equal measure, and being locked in a room with 11 complete strangers which was both surreal and slightly uncomfortable in similar volumes.
I am most surprised at how difficult it is to say something is true, 'beyond reasonable doubt' and the more i think about it, the more ridiculous it becomes. I think that this is because of my work. I spend all day doing science things, basically trying to attain some level of, if not absolute certainty about the result of an experiment. In court, you don't do this, you just listen to some people go,
'he did it'
and some other people go,
'i didn't do it'
and then hopefully there is some evidence to give you some sort of better clue. Then you think about it and go,
'yeah, i 'think' beyond reasonable doubt that they did (or didn't) do it'
Some of the people on the jury are nice, but really stupid, and I think that beyond any doubt whatsoever their thinking about it is 100% comprised of what the person next to them has just said. I swear I am not exaggerating. It bollocks, but I haven't got a better system to suggest so I'm just going to revert to the original idea for this post which was random thoughts I had while waiting to go into court:
1. Was there a big blog bang at the beginning of the blogosphere?
2. Is it possible to die of boredom?
3. Has anyone else come up with The Antarctic Apes as a great name for an Arctic Monkeys tribute band?
Case is very nearly closed...
Weight loss jabs, COP29, and Brainy birds
6 days ago
3 comments:
Question three is brilliant.
Perhaps you could also ask this of The Equatorial Penguins?
People are sheep, and it is frightening that they will allow their opinion to be so easily led when a persons future is at stake.
How exciting! Without a doubt...at least half of the jury is comprised of morons!
Yikes. Does it make you long to return to the standard of p < .05? How very nice such heuristics are.
Post a Comment